Facebook and Instagram have sought government protection from Jacob Rees-Mogg’s addition of 4,000 EU laws on the post-Brexit statute books.
In a letter to a parliamentary committee published on Friday, the parent group, metaAsks that the laws outlining social media firms be either “explicitly created elsewhere” or “removed from the scope” of the retained EU Law (Repeal and Reform) Bill.
If they are not, then group like Facebook “It will be less likely to work in the UK,” wrote Richard Earle, UK public policy manager at Meta.
Labor MP Stella Creasey said the bill could accidentally drive social media companies out of the UK.
“Many of us want social media companies to tell us how to use their platforms. Shutting them down by default is not the way to do it, but Meta itself says that because of the government’s REUL bill It is possible,” she tweeted.
Representatives of private and public interest groups were invited to contribute to the consultation on the bill in early November, with a flurry of organizations ranging from trade unions including the Institute of Directors, Unison, the TUC, and the Chartered Trading Standards Institute (CTSI) Had come , an organization dedicated to consumer health and safety protections.
In a letter published on Friday, the CTSI has called on the government to delay the bill warning that “vital legislation” covering food and product safety, animal health and welfare, fair trade, rogue and predatory trade, and legal metrology would be missed. There are 250 pieces. – A system of enforcing weights and measures so that consumers get what they pay for.
The CTSI says a survey conducted by it showed that the public was most concerned that the bill would affect food standards.
It also found that tackling EU legislation was last on voters’ list of priorities, with those most concerned about the cost of living and the NHS. The controversial bill was the brainchild of former Business Secretary Rees-Mogg.
The Bill is at committee stage in the Commons. It proposes to remove 4,000 laws, covering everything from animal testing of cosmetics to rights to holiday pay and passenger compensation, unless these are actively defended by a minister. It has been widely criticized by legal experts as “reckless” and “anti-democratic” because it gives unprecedented powers to ministers.
The speed with which the government wants to push through a bill introduced by Rees-Mogg in September, when he was trade minister, has also been criticized.
Under the so-called sunset clause, all EU law not amended or updated by 31 December 2023 will automatically cease to exist.
This week the bill was described as “not fit for purposeby the independent evaluator of Govt.
Earle wrote to the committee to draw its attention to a set of laws derived from the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002 which are at risk of being changed or removed.
The laws include provisions known as “intermediary liability” that protect social media companies from being held liable for user conduct and content.
Including the e-commerce directive within the bill’s scope “would raise serious concerns,” Early wrote.
If security “end effect” for social media operations was not maintained, he said platforms and websites “would be less likely to operate in the UK and could hold back from making the UK a hub for innovative new products”. ” and services in the way the government envisages”.